Baby names
How popular is the name Abigail?
In 2025, 4,941 baby girls in the U.S. were named Abigail, the 41st most popular name for girls. Its peak year was 2003, when 15,932 girls got the name. 413,263 girls have been named Abigail since 1880. 672 boys have had the name too.
Rank in 2025
#41
among girls' names
Babies in 2025
4,941
girls named Abigail
Peak year
2003
15,932 girls
Girls named Abigail each year since 1880
The interactive chart needs JavaScript. The numbers are in the table below.
The numbers for Abigail (girls)
| Year | Babies |
|---|---|
| 2025 | 4,941 |
| 2024 | 5,535 |
| 2023 | 5,687 |
| 2022 | 6,306 |
| 2021 | 6,993 |
| 2020 | 7,917 |
| 2019 | 9,196 |
| 2018 | 9,879 |
| 2017 | 10,645 |
| 2016 | 11,796 |
| 2015 | 12,422 |
| 2014 | 12,114 |
| 2013 | 12,429 |
| 2012 | 12,730 |
| 2011 | 13,266 |
| 2010 | 14,257 |
| 2009 | 14,401 |
| 2008 | 15,088 |
| 2007 | 15,476 |
| 2006 | 15,633 |
| 2005 | 15,756 |
| 2004 | 15,436 |
| 2003 | 15,932 |
| 2002 | 15,303 |
| 2001 | 14,807 |
| 2000 | 13,094 |
| 1999 | 11,686 |
| 1998 | 11,100 |
| 1997 | 9,630 |
| 1996 | 8,604 |
| 1995 | 7,825 |
| 1994 | 7,243 |
| 1993 | 5,185 |
| 1992 | 3,988 |
| 1991 | 3,799 |
| 1990 | 3,719 |
| 1989 | 3,405 |
| 1988 | 2,376 |
| 1987 | 2,001 |
| 1986 | 1,996 |
| 1985 | 1,848 |
| 1984 | 1,844 |
| 1983 | 1,909 |
| 1982 | 1,886 |
| 1981 | 1,816 |
| 1980 | 1,577 |
| 1979 | 1,226 |
| 1978 | 1,010 |
| 1977 | 794 |
| 1976 | 827 |
| 1975 | 615 |
| 1974 | 606 |
| 1973 | 479 |
| 1972 | 393 |
| 1971 | 392 |
| 1970 | 362 |
| 1969 | 281 |
| 1968 | 263 |
| 1967 | 244 |
| 1966 | 191 |
| 1965 | 209 |
| 1964 | 244 |
| 1963 | 255 |
| 1962 | 264 |
| 1961 | 232 |
| 1960 | 228 |
| 1959 | 206 |
| 1958 | 192 |
| 1957 | 187 |
| 1956 | 190 |
| 1955 | 180 |
| 1954 | 147 |
| 1953 | 169 |
| 1952 | 151 |
| 1951 | 137 |
| 1950 | 112 |
| 1949 | 113 |
| 1948 | 72 |
| 1947 | 78 |
| 1946 | 76 |
| 1945 | 53 |
| 1944 | 56 |
| 1943 | 63 |
| 1942 | 48 |
| 1941 | 40 |
| 1940 | 48 |
| 1939 | 53 |
| 1938 | 50 |
| 1937 | 45 |
| 1936 | 36 |
| 1935 | 37 |
| 1934 | 30 |
| 1933 | 32 |
| 1932 | 30 |
| 1931 | 27 |
| 1930 | 25 |
| 1929 | 33 |
| 1928 | 40 |
| 1927 | 33 |
| 1926 | 30 |
| 1925 | 37 |
| 1924 | 31 |
| 1923 | 32 |
| 1922 | 29 |
| 1921 | 24 |
| 1920 | 33 |
| 1919 | 31 |
| 1918 | 26 |
| 1917 | 41 |
| 1916 | 37 |
| 1915 | 38 |
| 1914 | 25 |
| 1913 | 14 |
| 1912 | 24 |
| 1911 | 18 |
| 1910 | 16 |
| 1909 | 12 |
| 1908 | 13 |
| 1907 | 12 |
| 1906 | 15 |
| 1905 | 11 |
| 1904 | 8 |
| 1903 | 20 |
| 1902 | 18 |
| 1901 | 13 |
| 1900 | 14 |
| 1899 | 7 |
| 1898 | 11 |
| 1897 | 15 |
| 1896 | 15 |
| 1895 | 15 |
| 1894 | 13 |
| 1893 | 21 |
| 1892 | 11 |
| 1891 | 11 |
| 1890 | 9 |
| 1889 | 20 |
| 1888 | 18 |
| 1887 | 13 |
| 1886 | 15 |
| 1885 | 9 |
| 1884 | 13 |
| 1883 | 11 |
| 1882 | 14 |
| 1881 | 8 |
| 1880 | 12 |
Boys named Abigail each year since 1880
The interactive chart needs JavaScript. The numbers are in the table below.
The numbers for Abigail (boys)
| Year | Babies |
|---|---|
| 2025 | Fewer than 5 |
| 2024 | Fewer than 5 |
| 2023 | 9 |
| 2022 | 6 |
| 2021 | 6 |
| 2020 | Fewer than 5 |
| 2019 | 11 |
| 2018 | 13 |
| 2017 | 6 |
| 2016 | 10 |
| 2015 | 10 |
| 2014 | 13 |
| 2013 | 16 |
| 2012 | 13 |
| 2011 | 21 |
| 2010 | 9 |
| 2009 | 16 |
| 2008 | 20 |
| 2007 | 27 |
| 2006 | 16 |
| 2005 | 13 |
| 2004 | 89 |
| 2003 | 23 |
| 2002 | 20 |
| 2001 | 19 |
| 2000 | 16 |
| 1999 | 17 |
| 1998 | 22 |
| 1997 | 6 |
| 1996 | 17 |
| 1995 | 12 |
| 1994 | 12 |
| 1993 | 12 |
| 1992 | 16 |
| 1991 | 13 |
| 1990 | 20 |
| 1989 | 22 |
| 1988 | 10 |
| 1987 | 13 |
| 1986 | 15 |
| 1985 | 12 |
| 1984 | 7 |
| 1983 | 12 |
| 1982 | 8 |
| 1981 | 7 |
| 1980 | 11 |
| 1979 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1978 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1977 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1976 | 6 |
| 1975 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1974 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1973 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1972 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1971 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1970 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1969 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1968 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1967 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1966 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1965 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1964 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1963 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1962 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1961 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1960 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1959 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1958 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1957 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1956 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1955 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1954 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1953 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1952 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1951 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1950 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1949 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1948 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1947 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1946 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1945 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1944 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1943 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1942 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1941 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1940 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1939 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1938 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1937 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1936 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1935 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1934 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1933 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1932 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1931 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1930 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1929 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1928 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1927 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1926 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1925 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1924 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1923 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1922 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1921 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1920 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1919 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1918 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1917 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1916 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1915 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1914 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1913 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1912 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1911 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1910 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1909 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1908 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1907 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1906 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1905 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1904 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1903 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1902 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1901 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1900 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1899 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1898 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1897 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1896 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1895 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1894 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1893 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1892 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1891 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1890 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1889 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1888 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1887 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1886 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1885 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1884 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1883 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1882 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1881 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1880 | Fewer than 5 |
Compare it with another name in the lookup chart. Look up any name
Share this name
Try another name
Source and notes
U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names from Social Security Card Applications (national data) (Public domain (U.S. government work)), data through 2025.
The counts come from Social Security card applications for babies born in the U.S., so the early years undercount everyone. A year with fewer than 5 babies of one sex given a name is left out for privacy and shows as fewer than 5. Spellings count separately: Emma and Ema are different names here.