Free course
How to read a chart
A free course of five short lessons on reading charts well: the axes, the units, rates versus counts, margins of error and checking the source. Each lesson uses a real chart of public data. No account needed.
5 lessons, about five minutes each, for students, teachers, librarians and anyone curious. The numbers update themselves when the charts get new data; newest data as of September 30, 2026.
Lesson 1
Read the axes first
Before you look at the shape of a chart, find out what its two axes measure and where they start.
The interactive chart needs JavaScript. The numbers are on the chart's page.
Source: NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, Climate at a Glance (Public domain (U.S. government work)), data as of December 31, 2025.
The axis along the bottom usually shows time or the things being compared. The axis up the side shows the amount. Read both before you decide what the chart is saying.
This chart shows the average temperature of the contiguous U.S. each year. Its side axis doesn't start at zero, and a note under the chart says so. That makes changes look bigger than they would on an axis from zero: the warmest and coolest years are 5.4°F apart, yet the line swings across most of the chart. That is fair here, because 0°F isn't a natural starting point for a climate and the chart tells you to read the numbers.
Bars are different. A bar's length stands for its value, so a bar chart that starts above zero misleads: a bar that looks twice as long may be only slightly bigger. When you meet one, read the numbers and ignore the lengths.
Try it
Find the warmest and coolest years on the chart. How far apart are they? Would the line look steeper or flatter on an axis that started at zero?
Show the answer
The warmest year was 2024, at 55.5°F, and the coolest was 1917, at 50.1°F, a gap of 5.4°F. The line would look much flatter, because the same gap would fill only a small part of an axis that started at zero.
Lesson 2
Find the units
A number means little until you know what it counts. The same fact can look very different in another unit.
The interactive chart needs JavaScript. The numbers are on the chart's page.
Source: U.S. Treasury Fiscal Data, Historical Debt Outstanding (Public domain (U.S. government work)), data as of September 30, 2026.
Look for the unit in the axis label or the title: dollars, percent, people, deaths per 100,000. Charts also shorten big numbers, so $30T on this chart's side axis means 30 trillion dollars.
Here is one fact in three units. At the end of fiscal 2026 the federal debt was $40.2 trillion in total, about $110,000 for each person in the U.S., and 125% of a year's GDP, everything the economy produces in a year. All three are true. They answer different questions.
Check money for one more thing: are these dollars of the day, or adjusted for inflation? This chart uses dollars of the day. A dollar bought far more in 1960 than it does now, so old and new figures aren't like for like.
- How much federal debt is there per American? →
- How big is the federal debt compared with the economy? →
Try it
Compare fiscal 2008 with the newest year on all three charts. How many times bigger is the debt in each unit?
Show the answer
In total dollars, about 4 times. Per person, about 3.3 times. As a share of GDP, about 1.8 times. The same debt grows less when you measure it against something that also grew, the population or the economy.
Lesson 3
Rates versus counts
A count says how many. A rate says how many out of how much, which is the fair way to compare different sizes.
The interactive chart needs JavaScript. The numbers are on the chart's page.
Source: NHTSA Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) (Public domain (U.S. government work)), data as of December 31, 2024.
The interactive chart needs JavaScript. The numbers are on the chart's page.
Source: NHTSA Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) and FHWA Highway Statistics (table VM-2) (Public domain (U.S. government work)), data as of December 31, 2024.
A rate divides a count by what could have been counted: per 100,000 people, or per mile driven. Whenever you see a rate, ask "per what?"
These two charts measure the same deaths. The first counts people killed in traffic crashes: 51,091 in 1980 and 39,254 in 2024. The second divides the deaths by the miles Americans drove: 3.35 deaths per 100 million miles in 1980 and 1.19 in 2024. Only the second takes into account how much driving people did.
Rates matter most when you compare places. A state with many people tends to have the most of nearly everything, so a ranking by count often just shows who is biggest. Ranked by rate, Mississippi had the highest traffic death rate in 2024, 1.81 deaths per 100 million miles.
Try it
From 1980 to the newest year, how much did the number of deaths change? How much did the rate change?
Show the answer
Deaths fell about 23%. The rate fell about 64%. The count tells you how many people died, and the rate tells you how dangerous each mile of driving was. You need both.
Lesson 4
Margins of error
A survey gives an estimate, not an exact count. Its margin of error shows the range the true figure likely falls in.
The interactive chart needs JavaScript. The numbers are on the chart's page.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (Public domain (U.S. government work). This product uses the Census Bureau Data API but is not endorsed or certified by the Census Bureau.), data as of December 31, 2024.
Many numbers come from asking some people rather than everyone. This chart's income figures come from a Census Bureau survey, so each state's figure carries a "±", its margin of error.
Massachusetts's median household income is $103,960 ± $527, so the true figure is likely between $103,433 and $104,487. The Census Bureau publishes its margins at 90% confidence, which means likely, not certain.
Rankings can make small gaps look important. When two ranges overlap, treat the two places as too close to call, even if one is ranked above the other.
Smaller places have wider margins, because the survey reaches fewer people there. California's estimate is $99,122 ± $310, while Owsley County, Kentucky's is $22,188 ± $9,297.
Try it
Find the second and third places on the ranking. Work out each range. Can you say for sure which is higher?
Show the answer
Massachusetts runs from $103,433 to $104,487, and Maryland from $103,081 to $104,275. Those ranges overlap, so the survey can't say for sure which is higher.
Lesson 5
Check the source
A chart is only as good as its data. Trace the numbers back to whoever collected them.
- Who collected the numbers? Look for the agency or group that gathered them, not only the site showing them.
- Can you open the source? A good citation links to a page where you can see the numbers yourself.
- How old is the data? Look for the data date, not the date a story was published.
- What is left out or changed? Look for notes on gaps, estimates, revisions and changed definitions.
- May it be reused? Look for the license if you plan to republish the chart.
The interactive chart needs JavaScript. The numbers are on the chart's page.
Source: FBI Crime Data Explorer, Uniform Crime Reporting Program (Public domain (U.S. government work); source FBI Uniform Crime Reporting Program), data as of December 31, 2025.
Try those five questions on this chart. Its source and data date (December 31, 2025) are under it, and the source name opens the FBI's own page.
The fourth question matters most here. These are crimes that police recorded and reported, so crimes nobody reported aren't in them. And in 2021 the FBI stopped taking its old summary reports. Many police departments hadn't switched to the newer system, so agencies covering only about 77% of Americans reported, against 88 to 98% in other years.
Chartly isn't the original source of any of these numbers. When you cite one in your own work, name the agency that collected it as well, and check it at the source if you can.
Try it
Which year on this chart should you trust least, and why? What would you write next to that number if you quoted it?
Show the answer
2021, when the chart shows 361 violent crimes per 100,000 people. Far fewer police agencies reported that year, so you might write: "less certain, because agencies covering only about 77% of Americans reported."
Keep practicing
For librarians and teachers
Link to this page from a research guide or class page. Students don't need an account, and each lesson has its own link (for example, margins of error).