How many babies get one of the year's 10 most popular names?
In 2025, 7.5% of babies got one of that year's 10 most popular names for their sex, down from 35% in 1880 and 29% in 1950. Parents now spread across far more names. The share counts babies of both sexes with a top-10 girls' or boys' name. Social Security leaves out any name given to fewer than 5 babies in a year, so the total is slightly short.
The interactive chart needs JavaScript. The numbers are in the table below.
The value axis starts at zero. Hover, tap or use the arrow keys to read exact values.
Save a simple drawing of this chart for slides, essays or posts, with its question, source, date and a link back to this page. Please keep the credit.
Download imageKey facts
Measure: Percent of babies given a top-10 name. Written from the data below.
- The latest figure, for 2025, is 7.5%.
- That is down 27.9 percentage points from 35.4% in 1880.
- The highest was 35.4% in 1880.
- It is the lowest in the data, which go back to 1880.
Source and date
- Data as of
- Published
Citation
Chartly. “How many babies get one of the year's 10 most popular names?” Chart. Data: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names from Social Security Card Applications (national data), https://www.ssa.gov/oact/babynames/limits.html (data as of December 31, 2025). https://chart.ly/charts/share-of-babies-with-a-top-10-name (accessed October 15, 2026).
Free for your article, blog or class page: paste this code where the chart should go. It shows the interactive chart with its source and a small “Chart by Chartly” credit, and stays up to date when the data changes.
The data
Download data (CSV)The file has the numbers in this table, with the source, license and date. Please credit the source and Chartly.
| Year | Percent of babies given a top-10 name |
|---|---|
| 1880 | 35.4 |
| 1881 | 34.4 |
| 1882 | 33.6 |
| 1883 | 32.7 |
| 1884 | 31.6 |
| 1885 | 30.7 |
| 1886 | 30.1 |
| 1887 | 29.3 |
| 1888 | 28.6 |
| 1889 | 28 |
| 1890 | 27.2 |
| 1891 | 26.7 |
| 1892 | 26.6 |
| 1893 | 26.3 |
| 1894 | 25.6 |
| 1895 | 25.4 |
| 1896 | 25.3 |
| 1897 | 25 |
| 1898 | 24.8 |
| 1899 | 24.6 |
| 1900 | 24.4 |
| 1901 | 23.9 |
| 1902 | 24.1 |
| 1903 | 24.1 |
| 1904 | 24 |
| 1905 | 23.7 |
| 1906 | 24.2 |
| 1907 | 23.9 |
| 1908 | 24.3 |
| 1909 | 24.4 |
| 1910 | 24.4 |
| 1911 | 25.3 |
| 1912 | 25.9 |
| 1913 | 26.2 |
| 1914 | 26.6 |
| 1915 | 26.5 |
| 1916 | 26.6 |
| 1917 | 26.8 |
| 1918 | 26.9 |
| 1919 | 26.7 |
| 1920 | 27.2 |
| 1921 | 27.3 |
| 1922 | 27.4 |
| 1923 | 27.6 |
| 1924 | 27.7 |
| 1925 | 27.7 |
| 1926 | 27.6 |
| 1927 | 27.7 |
| 1928 | 27.7 |
| 1929 | 27.8 |
| 1930 | 27.9 |
| 1931 | 28.3 |
| 1932 | 28.2 |
| 1933 | 28.1 |
| 1934 | 28.3 |
| 1935 | 29 |
| 1936 | 28.7 |
| 1937 | 28.6 |
| 1938 | 28.4 |
| 1939 | 28.3 |
| 1940 | 28.3 |
| 1941 | 28.6 |
| 1942 | 29 |
| 1943 | 29.3 |
| 1944 | 29.4 |
| 1945 | 29.2 |
| 1946 | 29.8 |
| 1947 | 30.1 |
| 1948 | 29.8 |
| 1949 | 29.4 |
| 1950 | 29.1 |
| 1951 | 29 |
| 1952 | 28.6 |
| 1953 | 28.3 |
| 1954 | 27.9 |
| 1955 | 27.3 |
| 1956 | 26.6 |
| 1957 | 25.6 |
| 1958 | 24.5 |
| 1959 | 23.8 |
| 1960 | 23.2 |
| 1961 | 22.8 |
| 1962 | 22.5 |
| 1963 | 22.6 |
| 1964 | 22.5 |
| 1965 | 22.4 |
| 1966 | 22.2 |
| 1967 | 22.2 |
| 1968 | 22.4 |
| 1969 | 22 |
| 1970 | 21.7 |
| 1971 | 21.8 |
| 1972 | 22.2 |
| 1973 | 22.2 |
| 1974 | 22.3 |
| 1975 | 21.7 |
| 1976 | 21.3 |
| 1977 | 21 |
| 1978 | 20.7 |
| 1979 | 20.7 |
| 1980 | 20.5 |
| 1981 | 20.6 |
| 1982 | 20.7 |
| 1983 | 21 |
| 1984 | 20.9 |
| 1985 | 20.5 |
| 1986 | 20.2 |
| 1987 | 20.1 |
| 1988 | 19.4 |
| 1989 | 18.7 |
| 1990 | 17.8 |
| 1991 | 16.7 |
| 1992 | 15.6 |
| 1993 | 15 |
| 1994 | 14.5 |
| 1995 | 14.1 |
| 1996 | 13.6 |
| 1997 | 13.4 |
| 1998 | 13 |
| 1999 | 12.5 |
| 2000 | 11.9 |
| 2001 | 11.3 |
| 2002 | 11 |
| 2003 | 10.7 |
| 2004 | 10.4 |
| 2005 | 9.9 |
| 2006 | 9.5 |
| 2007 | 9.3 |
| 2008 | 9 |
| 2009 | 8.9 |
| 2010 | 8.9 |
| 2011 | 8.9 |
| 2012 | 8.9 |
| 2013 | 8.7 |
| 2014 | 8.5 |
| 2015 | 8.4 |
| 2016 | 8.2 |
| 2017 | 8.2 |
| 2018 | 8.1 |
| 2019 | 8.1 |
| 2020 | 7.9 |
| 2021 | 7.7 |
| 2022 | 7.5 |
| 2023 | 7.5 |
| 2024 | 7.5 |
| 2025 | 7.5 |
Get new charts weekly
One email a week with the newest charts and their key numbers. No account needed.
More Baby names charts
-
Which baby names are rising fastest?
In 2025, Ailany gained more babies than any other name: 7,136 girls, up 4,530 from 2,606 in 2024. Eithan (boys) was next, up 2,037, then Cooper (boys), up 1,...
Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names from Social Security Card Applications (national data) · Data as of Dec 31, 2025
-
Which baby names are falling fastest?
In 2025, Liam lost more babies than any other name: 20,818 boys, 1,434 fewer than in 2024, though it was still the most popular boys' name. Dylan (boys) fell...
Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names from Social Security Card Applications (national data) · Data as of Dec 31, 2025
-
How many babies were given your name each year since 1880?
Type any name to see how many U.S. babies were given it each year since 1880, for girls or boys. Emma, shown first, went from 2,003 girls in 1880 down to 414...
Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names from Social Security Card Applications (national data) · Data as of Dec 31, 2025
-
What is the most popular girls' name in each state?
In 2025, Charlotte was the most popular girls' name in 28 states, even though Olivia was the top name nationally. In Vermont, 3.6% of girls were named Charlo...
Source: U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names from Social Security Card Applications (state data) · Data as of Dec 31, 2025