Baby names
How popular is the name Clyde?
In 2025, 350 baby boys in the U.S. were named Clyde, the 742nd most popular name for boys. Its peak year was 1920, when 3,069 boys got the name. 144,994 boys have been named Clyde since 1880. 3,932 girls have had the name too.
Rank in 2025
#742
among boys' names
Babies in 2025
350
boys named Clyde
Peak year
1920
3,069 boys
Boys named Clyde each year since 1880
The interactive chart needs JavaScript. The numbers are in the table below.
The numbers for Clyde (boys)
| Year | Babies |
|---|---|
| 2025 | 350 |
| 2024 | 362 |
| 2023 | 368 |
| 2022 | 395 |
| 2021 | 352 |
| 2020 | 348 |
| 2019 | 299 |
| 2018 | 328 |
| 2017 | 350 |
| 2016 | 298 |
| 2015 | 288 |
| 2014 | 285 |
| 2013 | 196 |
| 2012 | 158 |
| 2011 | 154 |
| 2010 | 137 |
| 2009 | 140 |
| 2008 | 143 |
| 2007 | 141 |
| 2006 | 129 |
| 2005 | 125 |
| 2004 | 137 |
| 2003 | 116 |
| 2002 | 112 |
| 2001 | 117 |
| 2000 | 144 |
| 1999 | 123 |
| 1998 | 154 |
| 1997 | 136 |
| 1996 | 133 |
| 1995 | 168 |
| 1994 | 152 |
| 1993 | 184 |
| 1992 | 199 |
| 1991 | 187 |
| 1990 | 250 |
| 1989 | 235 |
| 1988 | 223 |
| 1987 | 215 |
| 1986 | 241 |
| 1985 | 277 |
| 1984 | 291 |
| 1983 | 289 |
| 1982 | 309 |
| 1981 | 346 |
| 1980 | 386 |
| 1979 | 340 |
| 1978 | 353 |
| 1977 | 367 |
| 1976 | 386 |
| 1975 | 399 |
| 1974 | 416 |
| 1973 | 492 |
| 1972 | 487 |
| 1971 | 520 |
| 1970 | 621 |
| 1969 | 607 |
| 1968 | 626 |
| 1967 | 640 |
| 1966 | 666 |
| 1965 | 770 |
| 1964 | 891 |
| 1963 | 1,008 |
| 1962 | 1,137 |
| 1961 | 1,354 |
| 1960 | 1,372 |
| 1959 | 1,468 |
| 1958 | 1,552 |
| 1957 | 1,744 |
| 1956 | 1,716 |
| 1955 | 1,741 |
| 1954 | 1,777 |
| 1953 | 1,855 |
| 1952 | 2,014 |
| 1951 | 2,054 |
| 1950 | 1,985 |
| 1949 | 2,084 |
| 1948 | 2,073 |
| 1947 | 2,263 |
| 1946 | 2,065 |
| 1945 | 1,858 |
| 1944 | 2,081 |
| 1943 | 2,194 |
| 1942 | 2,206 |
| 1941 | 1,872 |
| 1940 | 2,014 |
| 1939 | 1,959 |
| 1938 | 2,130 |
| 1937 | 2,105 |
| 1936 | 2,153 |
| 1935 | 2,355 |
| 1934 | 2,323 |
| 1933 | 2,141 |
| 1932 | 2,319 |
| 1931 | 2,336 |
| 1930 | 2,631 |
| 1929 | 2,628 |
| 1928 | 2,713 |
| 1927 | 2,880 |
| 1926 | 2,873 |
| 1925 | 2,906 |
| 1924 | 3,006 |
| 1923 | 2,853 |
| 1922 | 3,007 |
| 1921 | 3,022 |
| 1920 | 3,069 |
| 1919 | 2,884 |
| 1918 | 2,917 |
| 1917 | 2,719 |
| 1916 | 2,707 |
| 1915 | 2,518 |
| 1914 | 1,954 |
| 1913 | 1,537 |
| 1912 | 1,314 |
| 1911 | 697 |
| 1910 | 617 |
| 1909 | 516 |
| 1908 | 511 |
| 1907 | 507 |
| 1906 | 457 |
| 1905 | 474 |
| 1904 | 457 |
| 1903 | 413 |
| 1902 | 382 |
| 1901 | 356 |
| 1900 | 451 |
| 1899 | 330 |
| 1898 | 383 |
| 1897 | 359 |
| 1896 | 372 |
| 1895 | 370 |
| 1894 | 386 |
| 1893 | 391 |
| 1892 | 390 |
| 1891 | 327 |
| 1890 | 317 |
| 1889 | 318 |
| 1888 | 344 |
| 1887 | 320 |
| 1886 | 307 |
| 1885 | 318 |
| 1884 | 345 |
| 1883 | 336 |
| 1882 | 293 |
| 1881 | 232 |
| 1880 | 221 |
Girls named Clyde each year since 1880
The interactive chart needs JavaScript. The numbers are in the table below.
The numbers for Clyde (girls)
| Year | Babies |
|---|---|
| 2025 | Fewer than 5 |
| 2024 | Fewer than 5 |
| 2023 | Fewer than 5 |
| 2022 | Fewer than 5 |
| 2021 | Fewer than 5 |
| 2020 | Fewer than 5 |
| 2019 | Fewer than 5 |
| 2018 | Fewer than 5 |
| 2017 | Fewer than 5 |
| 2016 | Fewer than 5 |
| 2015 | Fewer than 5 |
| 2014 | Fewer than 5 |
| 2013 | Fewer than 5 |
| 2012 | Fewer than 5 |
| 2011 | Fewer than 5 |
| 2010 | Fewer than 5 |
| 2009 | Fewer than 5 |
| 2008 | Fewer than 5 |
| 2007 | Fewer than 5 |
| 2006 | Fewer than 5 |
| 2005 | Fewer than 5 |
| 2004 | Fewer than 5 |
| 2003 | Fewer than 5 |
| 2002 | Fewer than 5 |
| 2001 | Fewer than 5 |
| 2000 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1999 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1998 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1997 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1996 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1995 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1994 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1993 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1992 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1991 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1990 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1989 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1988 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1987 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1986 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1985 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1984 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1983 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1982 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1981 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1980 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1979 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1978 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1977 | 7 |
| 1976 | 5 |
| 1975 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1974 | 6 |
| 1973 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1972 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1971 | 5 |
| 1970 | 6 |
| 1969 | 8 |
| 1968 | 6 |
| 1967 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1966 | 5 |
| 1965 | 8 |
| 1964 | 6 |
| 1963 | 6 |
| 1962 | Fewer than 5 |
| 1961 | 13 |
| 1960 | 13 |
| 1959 | 11 |
| 1958 | 14 |
| 1957 | 9 |
| 1956 | 12 |
| 1955 | 15 |
| 1954 | 13 |
| 1953 | 13 |
| 1952 | 22 |
| 1951 | 14 |
| 1950 | 16 |
| 1949 | 19 |
| 1948 | 19 |
| 1947 | 33 |
| 1946 | 21 |
| 1945 | 29 |
| 1944 | 24 |
| 1943 | 30 |
| 1942 | 27 |
| 1941 | 29 |
| 1940 | 23 |
| 1939 | 18 |
| 1938 | 42 |
| 1937 | 36 |
| 1936 | 41 |
| 1935 | 32 |
| 1934 | 39 |
| 1933 | 31 |
| 1932 | 50 |
| 1931 | 49 |
| 1930 | 66 |
| 1929 | 65 |
| 1928 | 75 |
| 1927 | 87 |
| 1926 | 71 |
| 1925 | 88 |
| 1924 | 86 |
| 1923 | 81 |
| 1922 | 100 |
| 1921 | 86 |
| 1920 | 95 |
| 1919 | 109 |
| 1918 | 109 |
| 1917 | 124 |
| 1916 | 116 |
| 1915 | 117 |
| 1914 | 96 |
| 1913 | 87 |
| 1912 | 59 |
| 1911 | 68 |
| 1910 | 55 |
| 1909 | 60 |
| 1908 | 48 |
| 1907 | 56 |
| 1906 | 64 |
| 1905 | 57 |
| 1904 | 55 |
| 1903 | 52 |
| 1902 | 50 |
| 1901 | 62 |
| 1900 | 65 |
| 1899 | 53 |
| 1898 | 46 |
| 1897 | 56 |
| 1896 | 50 |
| 1895 | 49 |
| 1894 | 39 |
| 1893 | 46 |
| 1892 | 45 |
| 1891 | 34 |
| 1890 | 47 |
| 1889 | 38 |
| 1888 | 34 |
| 1887 | 31 |
| 1886 | 21 |
| 1885 | 25 |
| 1884 | 22 |
| 1883 | 13 |
| 1882 | 19 |
| 1881 | 17 |
| 1880 | 13 |
Compare it with another name in the lookup chart. Look up any name
Share this name
Try another name
Source and notes
U.S. Social Security Administration, Baby Names from Social Security Card Applications (national data) (Public domain (U.S. government work)), data through 2025.
The counts come from Social Security card applications for babies born in the U.S., so the early years undercount everyone. A year with fewer than 5 babies of one sex given a name is left out for privacy and shows as fewer than 5. Spellings count separately: Emma and Ema are different names here.